AI drafts. People decide.
Every AI-assisted section routes through a review gate before it is saved, and every draft, edit and approval is on the record.
Responsible AI →About
Why we're building this.
An IEP is a legal document that decides how a child gets taught. The
time it takes to write one shouldn't come out of the time available to
teach. IEPeasyhub exists to give that time back, without cutting the
review a legal document deserves.
Who we are
Subject Matter Expert
Extensive experience in special education, led by an experienced practitioner who still works in the field today. The product is shaped by how IEPs are actually written, reviewed and delivered in a classroom, not by how software imagines them.
Technology
Extensive experience architecting and building software that solves real business problems, not technology for its own sake. Here that means row-level security, an audit trail that cannot be edited, and AI that drafts but never decides.
Solution
A joint venture of the two: special-education expertise and production-grade engineering in one product. Built for the people who write the plan, the teams who review it, and the families who live with it.
The gap we saw
Two kinds of tools existed. Neither was built for the document a case manager signs.
What existed
General AI tools
Plausible, IEP-shaped text, with nothing to say where it came from.
What we built
A draft you can stand behind
Grounded in the student's record, reviewed by a person before it saves, and traceable afterward.
What existed
Generic IEP software
One national template, with Florida's rules left for the district to translate.
What we built
Florida in its own terms
The Matrix of Services, FLDOE's forms in FLDOE's words, and the state's own clocks, from the first commit.
How we build
Three rules every feature is held to. None of them is a launch-day promise.
Enforced, not promised.
Row-level security on every table that holds a record, de-identification before every AI call, and automated checks that test both.
Security →State law is data.
A state's categories, clocks, forms and funding live in the product as data, not as a template, which is what lets us build the next state in its own terms.
Florida →Where we're headed
Special education is federal law, lived state by state. Each state sets its own clocks, its own forms, its own funding and its own reporting. We build each one in its own terms, starting where we are.
Choose a phase to see each step.
Phase 1 · Now
Florida, in its own terms
Built on Florida's own rules: the 60-day evaluation clock counted in calendar days with the rule's exclusions, FLDOE's consent forms in FLDOE's words, the Matrix of Services with the funding it drives, and the state survey record checked before it leaves.
In early access today.
Phase 2 · Next
The Southeast, one state at a time
Florida's neighbors next. Each state with its own eligibility rules, its own timelines, its own forms and funding and its own state reporting built in, not a Florida template with the names changed.
States shown are where we expect to start. We name each one when it is built.
Phase 3 · Then
Every state, the same way
Nationwide, on the same principle. A state is ready when its own law is in the product, not when its name is on a list.
No dates promised; a state ships when it is right.
